|
In the News
13 May 2005
Gaining Synergy with Strained Silicon
Strained silicon is one of the key technology boosters identified by the
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) as being essential to
the continuation of classical scaling. The enhanced carrier mobilities made
possible through strain engineering result in noteworthy device performance
improvements. Current candidates for high-k gate dielectrics cause significant
carrier degradation in the channel, and high-mobility channels will be needed to
restore the losses. Without strained Si, high-k transistors will have no
performance improvement over transistors with conventional gate oxides.
There are several different approaches for introducing strain into the Si
channel of deeply scaled MOSFETs. Of these, process-induced (uniaxial) strain
and bulk wafer (biaxial) strain are the two most promising candidates, and they
are featured in the R&D activities of device manufacturers worldwide. The
successful production of 300mm strained silicon-on-insulator (sSOI) wafer
samples also has been announced, and sSOI substrates soon will become
commercially available for both partially and fully depleted CMOS devices.
Given the diversity of different strained Si materials available, it is not
surprising that many IDMs and foundries are evaluating all the options to
determine which provide the best solutions in terms of performance,
manufacturability, and cost.
Which strained silicon option is best?
So which strained Si options provide the best solutions for both today’s and
tomorrow’s technology requirements? Can process-induced strain be scaled without
introducing unacceptable levels of process complexity and cost? And is the
position of global strain becoming stronger in the future?
The 2004 edition of the ITRS [1] stated that higher “transconductance/mobility
improvement factors” will be required for the 65nm technology node. The levels
of strain needed to obtain such improvements are currently only achievable using
global strain methods, in which the lattice constant is engineered using an
epitaxial process. Global strain will also be essential to the manufacture of
sSOI substrates.
It is very important that process-induced strain, global strain, and SOI are not
considered competing technologies. New sSOI materials are synergistic, and it is
highly feasible that process-induced and global strain used in a complementary
fashion could provide similar synergy (e.g., nMOS enhancement provided by global
strain and pMOS enhancement by process-induced strain).
Global strain
Epitaxial strained Si layers grown on relaxed SiGe buffers provide the highest
levels of strain and strain uniformity with a 1% (typical) Si lattice
deformation, resulting in a strain value of 1.5GPa.
Although the process integration challenges of building sub-100nm MOSFETs on
bulk strained Si wafers are not trivial, many device manufacturers are close to
solutions and are now working with strained Si suppliers to identify which
substrate parameters are most relevant to performance and yield. One of the
recent findings of this interaction is that pMOS carrier mobility enhancement is
a strong function of short length-scale microroughness. A significant reduction
in strained Si surface microroughness, achieved by optimizing the epitaxy
process, results in reported transconductance improvements of up to 28% for
short-channel pMOSFETs (Fig. 1).
| |
 |
|
| |
Figure 1. Comparative
transconductance data for 90nm pMOS devices (70nm physical gate length).
|
|
The good news is that this improvement is possible without the intermediate CMP
step typically used to remove the relaxed buffer layer cross-hatch prior to
growing the strained Si layer. This means that the complete strained Si wafer
can be epitaxially grown in a single pass through the CVD reactor. Reducing the
number of process steps translates into significant defect reduction, avoidance
of undesirable interfaces, and a degree of crystallinity that can exceed that of
a bulk Si substrate due to the high quality of the epitaxial growth.
Significant reduction to both cost and cycle time is achieved by manufacturing
strained Si wafers in a single-stage process, which brings the cost of
high-quality bulk strained wafers in line with SOI.
The Raman data shown in Fig. 2 demonstrate that strain relaxation of 99% is
uniformly maintained across the wafer surface. Strain levels of 1.15 ±0.01GPa
are demonstrated for strained Si layers grown on relaxed SiGe buffers with a
germanium content of 17%.
| |
 |
|
| |
Figure 2. Raman data showing
cross-wafer strain uniformity. |
|
Another important point is that global strain processes currently are the only
viable method for producing sSOI substrates. Such materials combine the
advantage of enhanced mobility with the low-power benefits of SOI and are needed
for manufacturing fully depleted CMOS devices at and beyond the 65nm node. The
manufacture of such substrates requires the layer transfer of an epitaxially
grown, high-quality strained Si layer onto a thermally oxidized second wafer.
Process-induced strain
The benefits of using process-induced strain already
have been successfully demonstrated at the 90nm technology node. This approach
allows the device performance of pMOS and nMOS transistors to be tuned
independently and avoids introducing threading dislocations into the channel
regions.
Options for process-induced strain on ultrathin-body (UTB) SOI and sSOI are
limited because the current techniques for imparting compressive strain in the
pMOS channel use a deeply recessed, selective SiGe structure. This approach
works well for bulk substrates, but the depth of recess required cannot be
supported in the very thin layer of Si available on UTB SOI substrates.
Tight control of the individual manufacturing stages employed in process-induced
strain is essential to achieving consistent strain levels. Control of parameters
including the pMOS spacer recess depth, recess isotropy, and selective SiGe
process are additional requirements for current devices. Additional
process-induced strain stages will be needed to leverage further performance
enhancements. Each of these processes introduces an additional source of
variation to the final strain level and adds to product cost and cycle time.
Future convergence
The current ITRS shows that the mobility/transconductance improvement factor
will have to increase from 1.4× to 2× when the technology node transitions from
90nm to 65nm in 2007. This improvement factor is necessary to achieve the
required saturated drive-current values and is a monumental jump from the
current value of 1.3×. No one has yet proposed how we will reach this level of
improvement, but strain in one or more forms will be essential.
Epitaxial strained Si layers grown on higher Ge-content buffer layers (Ge >30%)
would provide the required level of enhancement for both holes and electrons.
The caveat is that it would also mean reduced Si-layer critical thickness,
increased dislocation defect density, and increased Ge diffusion into the
strained Si.
Layer transfer of such films to produce sSOI with higher levels of strain would
be SiGe-free, thus avoiding many of the major integration issues, including Ge
diffusion. Another benefit is that any vertical dislocation defects would
terminate at the oxide, which reduces potential leakage paths to the substrate.
Complete absence of SiGe also resolves arsenic diffusivity issues and plasma
etching difficulties, and overcomes additional leakage problems due to the
reduced bandgap at the drain electrode.
The process integration challenges are replaced by the substrate manufacturing
challenges of producing high-quality strained Si layers and successfully
transferring them to produce sSOI.
It is likely that the combined benefits of global strain, SOI, and
process-induced strain will be needed to deliver the levels of device
performance enhancement required by the 2004 ITRS. Independently, they will not
be able to do so.
Reference
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, 2004 edition, SIA; http://public.itrs.net.
Robert Harper received his BSc (Hons.) from the U. of Wales, Swansea, and is
currently studying for an MSc in advanced silicon processing and manufacturing
technologies. He is technical sales manager at IQE, Beech House, Cypress Dr.,
St. Mellons, Cardiff, Wales CF3 OLW; e-mail RHarper@IQESilicon.com.
Solid State Technology May, 2005
Author(s) : Robert Harper
For the original article, visit the Solid State Technology International website:

Contact:
Chris Meadows, IQE plc
+44 (0) 29 2083 9400
Previous News
Back to News Index
Next News
|